ArmyStudyGuide.com Community

   

ArmyStudyGuide.com's Community is an Army Forum
 
ArmyStudyGuide.com    ArmyStudyGuide Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Community Discussion  Hop To Forums  Current Events / News    Basic Training Going Soft
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 

Picture of grlrplmstr
Posted
Just read the latest Army Times with the front page about basic training. For the record:
THE DRILL SERGEANTS HAVE NOT A DAMN THING TO DO WITH THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We didn't decide to let privates do pushups on their knees or sleep late. Or be nice during R&I. Or give them privileges in week 1 that you had to wait until week 8 for.
And if you don't give the privates all that and actually (gasp!swoon!horror!) demand they train for war and be somewhat stressed, you'll be at best case, one rank light and a new job.
Of course, that's Relaxin' Jackson. Hopefully it'll be awhile before it takes over the other training posts.
 
Posts: 957 | Location: Platoon Mama in the Last Frontier!! | Registered: 08 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
I skimmed the article for a minute and then had to put it down because it's just so ridiculous. All those changes are going to do is create a bunch of soft soldiers who don't think they have to work hard. Glad to hear that it's nothing you or your fellow drill sergeants wanted. Though I couldn't imagine why I drill sergeant would want it to be like that.

You know, people keep saying how the standards of the Army are falling with the new tattoo regulation and such, but that's not where the lower standards are. It's when things like this happen that standards are lowered.


My Photos: www.flickr.com/photos/thefrosty1
My blog (it's new and pretty and gets updated almost daily): www.gypsygentilli.com
MySpace: www.myspace.com/gypsygentilli
 
Posts: 414 | Location: Barstow, CA | Registered: 14 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Liquidlunch1812
Posted Hide Post
My whole section was in an uproar when we read the article. We thought it was bad when the PT standards changed.


“If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead, either write something worth reading or do things worth writing.”
-Ben Franklin
 
Posts: 41 | Location: Hawaii | Registered: 03 March 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Caffeine Addict
Posted Hide Post
Something tells me I have to read this article.

I was away last week on a roadtrip and missed the Army Times.
 
Posts: 430 | Location: Fort Stewart (I'm backkkk in Iraq! Ramadi, Iraq!) | Registered: 28 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Aviation101
Posted Hide Post
Hearing this is really making me more and more excited about going to BCT at Jackson... *sarcastic voice*


The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important then his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and and has no chance of being free unless made so and kept so by the exertions of better men then himself. John Stuart Mill
 
Posts: 593 | Location: Walter Reed Army Medical Center,DC | Registered: 05 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Jenny
Posted Hide Post
I remember when my husband came back from OSUT in Benning, he was actually thankful(after words, he hated it while doing it lol) for having it hard and tough. It was a great accomplishment and made him realize that he is capable of some wild things and able to perform them under pressure, stress, and pain. And the same Drill SGTs, who yelled and pushed, when he got awarded and promoted, they were so proud of him because they contributed.

My personal opinion is - that's part of being in the military...and has nothing to do with the word "SOFT". A soldier should be "physically and mentally tough" and to become one, "SOFT" training is out of the question.
 
Posts: 111 | Location: Texas | Registered: 17 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


USAR Career Counselor
Doctrine Nerd
Picture of Daddy Warcrimes
Posted Hide Post
All I have to say is this:
Army Times told me back in 97 that in a few years we would all be shooting M-4s with reflex sights.

9 years later, I'm still waiting for mine.


This is a ten level task
DW Blog
 
Posts: 2091 | Location: 9th Region ARCD, MO | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
In IET land is were you are going to see the biggest issue (and we already are). You will have "Soldiers" who suddenly have to push themselves to learn and train at the same time. They will want to quit and go back to the easy life. So it will be a waste of time and tons of money.

As for me... if they get to me that soft, then they will just have to make it through my own BCT so I can trust them and their training.


Live Life All The Time
 
Posts: 295 | Location: Somewhere out there | Registered: 25 September 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Pvt_Harris
Posted Hide Post
Army Times=Military Enquirer


Assist, Protect, Defend
MPs lead the way!
 
Posts: 177 | Location: Jacksonville FL | Registered: 07 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of SGT_Babysitter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Daddy Warcrimes:
All I have to say is this:
Army Times told me back in 97 that in a few years we would all be shooting M-4s with reflex sights.

9 years later, I'm still waiting for mine.


I thought all units had M-4's with day time optics and night time infrared lasers.
 
Posts: 82 | Location: CONUS | Registered: 03 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


USAR Career Counselor
Doctrine Nerd
Picture of Daddy Warcrimes
Posted Hide Post
My previous outfit had the IR lasers, reflex sights, a few M-4s for the squad leaders and M-16A4s (Army Times never predicted those) for the riflemen/grenadiers.

My current outfit has no tactical equipment assigned so we borrow when we can. The last 3 ranges I fired were with A2s.


This is a ten level task
DW Blog
 
Posts: 2091 | Location: 9th Region ARCD, MO | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Epic Honor
Posted Hide Post
Back to the topic at hand...Since when did they start giving SPC to 18 year olds from high school?!?!?!?


 
Posts: 1415 | Location: Fort Carson | Registered: 02 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of My kids call me Sarge
Posted Hide Post
I've seen 18yo SPC too, how does that happen? I fully believe that someone should earn rank starting at E-0 and work thier way up. Getting promoted also raises the morale and gives them something to look forward to.
The Army has lowered the standards for basic in some areas. I haven't seen the Standards for the infantry lowered very much, but every once in a while we will get a soldier that is not in top shape, and it takes an NCO away from his family two hours a day everyday to train that soldier and that really isn't fair.
The M-4s, I believe that every unit that needs them has them. We have had them since 99 in the 101st, same for Bragg and Lewis and 10th mountain.. with 68s and peq-2s, and surefire flashlights, and we have the new m249s without the gas regulator and the shorter barrels.

http://www.myspace.com/iplayhalonaked
 
Posts: 10 | Location: Fort Campbell, KY/TN | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
And no matter how many hills you had to ruck up both ways in the snow in basic, it will still be nothing like what your fathers went through. No matter what, everyone will always consider that the next generation had it easier.

Oh..."I thought all units had M-4's with day time optics and night time infrared lasers." Please tell me this was sarcasm. We just got 40 M-4 "hand-me-downs" from another unit, half of which need to go out to direct support to actually be worth taking up space in our arms room.
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: 17 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Career Counselor
Picture of ArmyReenlistment
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by My kids call me Sarge:
I fully believe that someone should earn rank starting at E-0 and work thier way up. Getting promoted also raises the morale and gives them something to look forward to.


So, are you saying that Soldiers coming in as a PV2, PFC, or SPC didn't "earn" their rank?

I guess on a side note, aren't most E-1s through E-4s treated the same? From details to duties to skill level, privates are in the same category as SPCs.

I know promotions are a morale booster, but what exactly is being earned? Oh yeah I forgot, promotions are still "given" through SPC.

So, how is rank being "earned" nowadays through SPC?


It's YOUR career! Take control of it before someone else does.
http://www.ArmyReenlistment.com
 
Posts: 6262 | Location: Fort McPherson, GA (FORSCOM) | Registered: 31 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4  
 

ArmyStudyGuide.com    ArmyStudyGuide Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Community Discussion  Hop To Forums  Current Events / News    Basic Training Going Soft

Untitled Document
 
 
   
 
    
Civilian Job Translator
Match your military MOS with civilian jobs and training.
Salary & Degree Finder
Find salary and degree info for civilian careers.
 
 
  
Google Site maps Generator Tool